
- Home
- Research
- Find research
- Anna Thulin: An increasing number affected by breast cancer with brain metastases
Anna Thulin: An increasing number affected by breast cancer with brain metastases
Breast cancer that spreads to the brain is becoming more common. Anna Thulin鈥檚 doctoral thesis provides new insights into this disease. Her research could help better characterize brain metastases and lead to the development of new preventive drugs.

ANNA THULIN
Dissertation defense: 6 September 2024 (click for details)
Doctoral thesis:
Research area: Oncology
Sahlgrenska Academy, The Institute of Clinical 91探花s
Even though as many as nine out of ten breast cancer patients are cured, it remains the deadliest cancer for women in Sweden and globally.
Disseminated breast cancer has spread from the breast to other parts of the body. In this setting cure is almost impossible but treatments may prolong a patient鈥檚 life. Treatment selection is based on the subgroup of breast cancer the patient has been diagnosed with.
鈥淭he treatments currently given to prevent relapse and prolong life, unfortunately are not reducing brain metastases from breast cancer. Brain metastases have not been as thoroughly researched as other metastatic sites. This may be due to the condition not being as common previously, and that there were very few effective treatments for brain metastases,鈥 says Anna Thulin, an oncology resident at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and a doctoral student at the Institute of Clinical 91探花s.
Studying cancer鈥檚 transformation
What is your research about?
鈥淲e compared patients鈥 breast cancer with a brain metastasis from the same patient. By comparing the cancer cells and surrounding tissue, the adaptations in cancer cells as it spreads from breast to brain may be studied. We used mutation analyses, gene expression analyses, and protein level studies using immunohistochemistry. We also added clinical data such as number of patients diagnosed over time.鈥

Increasing number of patients affected
What are the key findings of your research?
鈥淲e found that the number of patients developing brain metastases increased over time. This knowledge is crucial in evaluating whether we should screen for brain metastases, and to increase the number of patients with brain metastases included in clinical trials.鈥
What did the comparisons between tissue samples from primary breast tumors and brain metastases reveal?
鈥淲e found that the subtype of breast cancer changes in 25% of patients. This is about the same proportion as in other metastatic locations. The brain is a difficult location for biopsy but this highlights the need for new methods such as liquid biopsy.鈥
Suppressed immune system in metastases
鈥淲e have studied both gene mutations, expression of genes, and also stained immune cells in the matched material. There we see that gene expression changes, particularly those genes related to the immune system,鈥 explains Anna Thulin, adding:
鈥淲e found that both immune cells and genes involved in the immune response were significantly lower in brain metastases than in primary breast tumors. This could explain why immunotherapy is not very effective against brain metastases from breast cancer.鈥
What practical benefits could your research provide?
鈥淢y results might contribute to an increased understanding of the biology of brain metastases, which has previously been quite limited. I now hope for better characterization of brain metastases with new methods, but above all for new medications to better prevent brain metastasization.鈥

鈥淟earned things I never thought possible鈥
What has been rewarding and challenging about your doctoral project?
鈥I have learned a lot that I didn鈥檛 think was possible. For example, I now feel relatively confident with statistics. For a doctor who is used to clinical work, it is challenging to take on more preclinical methods, as well as methods from other specialties,鈥 says Anna Thulin, and continues:
鈥淚t has required collaboration with others and delving into topics that initially felt too difficult. Doing research also makes one better at evaluating research by others, benefitting clinical work.鈥
Text: Jakob Lundberg